<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 development-related things I&#8217;d love to see in SharePoint vNext</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mastykarz.nl/10-development-related-sharepoint-vnext/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mastykarz.nl/10-development-related-sharepoint-vnext/</link>
	<description>Innovation Matters &#124; SharePoint Server MVP &#124; ISSN 2210-9390</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaap</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastykarz.nl/10-development-related-sharepoint-vnext/comment-page-1/#comment-11282</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mastykarz.nl/10-development-related-sharepoint-vnext/#comment-11282</guid>
		<description>100% agree on the versioning of content types and features!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% agree on the versioning of content types and features!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastykarz.nl/10-development-related-sharepoint-vnext/comment-page-1/#comment-10919</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mastykarz.nl/10-development-related-sharepoint-vnext/#comment-10919</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more mate.. I hope in the next version the WSS team and MOSS team have a better understanding on what to incorporate in the OM and how to access those. 

Very basic example : why is the Central Administration Webapplication only being returned if you want to have all the &#039;administrative&#039; webapplications in your farm. You would suspect that the SSP Admin webapplication also would be marked as an &#039;administrative&#039; webapp right?

If all those tiny things would be looked after then the SharePoint development world is a better place to live in ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#039;t agree more mate.. I hope in the next version the WSS team and MOSS team have a better understanding on what to incorporate in the OM and how to access those. </p>
<p>Very basic example : why is the Central Administration Webapplication only being returned if you want to have all the &#039;administrative&#039; webapplications in your farm. You would suspect that the SSP Admin webapplication also would be marked as an &#039;administrative&#039; webapp right?</p>
<p>If all those tiny things would be looked after then the SharePoint development world is a better place to live in ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

