<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Documenting the Imtech SharePoint Enhancement toolkit using Sandcastle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mastykarz.nl/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mastykarz.nl/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/</link>
	<description>Innovation Matters &#124; SharePoint Server MVP &#124; ISSN 2210-9390</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:31:18 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldek Mastykarz</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastykarz.nl/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/comment-page-1/#comment-28275</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldek Mastykarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mastykarz.nl/2008/03/03/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/#comment-28275</guid>
		<description>@James: Releasing the toolkit isn&#039;t something we&#039;re planning to do. Parhaps in the future but not at this moment.

As for the Web Parts: you can fix the tables issue by simply removing them using a Control Adapter. Please note that such Control Adapter breaks the Web Part Page Script Component (WPSC).
In all the WCM solutions I&#039;ve been working on, I&#039;m trying to use the standard SharePoint functionality unless it&#039;s really impossible to do. On the other hand I haven&#039;t tried every available Web Part and not all customers require a fully accessible web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James: Releasing the toolkit isn&#039;t something we&#039;re planning to do. Parhaps in the future but not at this moment.</p>
<p>As for the Web Parts: you can fix the tables issue by simply removing them using a Control Adapter. Please note that such Control Adapter breaks the Web Part Page Script Component (WPSC).<br />
In all the WCM solutions I&#039;ve been working on, I&#039;m trying to use the standard SharePoint functionality unless it&#039;s really impossible to do. On the other hand I haven&#039;t tried every available Web Part and not all customers require a fully accessible web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastykarz.nl/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/comment-page-1/#comment-28255</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mastykarz.nl/2008/03/03/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/#comment-28255</guid>
		<description>Hi Waldek,

Is the Imtech SharePoint Enhancement Toolkit still going to be released to the community? Would be great if so.

I&#039;m also keen to pick your brains on a problem I have. We have a heavily customised SharePoint 2007 website which must (and indeed does) achieve WCAG 1.0 AA standards. However in order to achieve this the site users entirely custom controls - no web parts. We&#039;ve noticed that no search statistics are being generated and have investigated this to the point where we now realise that the SharePoint Search web parts do a lot more than just output the results. They also generate javascript based web service calls that log queries and clickthroughs for the search statistic reports found in the SSP. 

I see that accessibility in SharePoint is something that you&#039;re particularly knowledgable on. How have you got around this problem? Do you continue to use the standard web parts? Don&#039;t they break the AA rule of using tables for layout? Or is there another way to generate the statistics that I&#039;m unaware of?

Thanks for your help with this.

James.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Waldek,</p>
<p>Is the Imtech SharePoint Enhancement Toolkit still going to be released to the community? Would be great if so.</p>
<p>I&#039;m also keen to pick your brains on a problem I have. We have a heavily customised SharePoint 2007 website which must (and indeed does) achieve WCAG 1.0 AA standards. However in order to achieve this the site users entirely custom controls &#8211; no web parts. We&#039;ve noticed that no search statistics are being generated and have investigated this to the point where we now realise that the SharePoint Search web parts do a lot more than just output the results. They also generate javascript based web service calls that log queries and clickthroughs for the search statistic reports found in the SSP. </p>
<p>I see that accessibility in SharePoint is something that you&#039;re particularly knowledgable on. How have you got around this problem? Do you continue to use the standard web parts? Don&#039;t they break the AA rule of using tables for layout? Or is there another way to generate the statistics that I&#039;m unaware of?</p>
<p>Thanks for your help with this.</p>
<p>James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldek Mastykarz</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastykarz.nl/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/comment-page-1/#comment-7932</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldek Mastykarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mastykarz.nl/2008/03/03/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/#comment-7932</guid>
		<description>Hi Deavon,

Thank you for your comment. Perhaps I could be of any help before I write the step-by-step guide? I&#039;m curious what your challenges are and what have you already tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Deavon,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment. Perhaps I could be of any help before I write the step-by-step guide? I&#039;m curious what your challenges are and what have you already tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deavon M. McCaffery</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastykarz.nl/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/comment-page-1/#comment-7911</link>
		<dc:creator>Deavon M. McCaffery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mastykarz.nl/2008/03/03/documenting-the-imtech-sharepoint-enhancement-toolkit-using-sandcastle/#comment-7911</guid>
		<description>You mention in this post that you will soon provide a step-by-step solution to managing SharePoint references with Sandcastle.  While I have done this in the past, I was never able to get it to work perfectly. I would be interested to find out more about how you were able to solve the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention in this post that you will soon provide a step-by-step solution to managing SharePoint references with Sandcastle.  While I have done this in the past, I was never able to get it to work perfectly. I would be interested to find out more about how you were able to solve the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
